MovieCrypt.com recent movie reviews and film critique appear on Rotten Tomatoes
An Online Film Critics Society Member

Film critique with a focus on storytelling, supernatural elements, and the potential to become a cinema classic.
Crypt · Search  ||  Reviews · Previews · Rantings  ||  Store · Contact
about · lexicon · terms · ratings · extras · mobile · links · feeds · video 

← Review: ‘Star Trek’ (2009)
“Dollhouse” Season 1 DVD Drops July 28th →

Review: ‘Angels & Demons’

Much better than the Da Vinci Code, but this isn’t exactly the definitive work on science vs. faith, either.

Harvard professor Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks), head of the non-existent Symbology Dept. (go ahead, look it up) is tapped by the Vatican police to look into a mysterious message. At the same time, CERN physicist Vittoria Vetra (Ayelet Zurer, too good looking to be a physicist) discovers a dead colleague and that a bit of harvested anti-matter has gone missing. If all this wasn’t enough, the previous Pope died recently and all Cardinals have been recalled to Vatican city, and THEN a video showing the four most eligible Cardinals have been kidnapped to be made examples of before destroying Vatican City with (you guessed it) an anti-matter bomb. Will Robert Langdon be able to solve the mystery with his Sampson-like hair cut off and possibly get a love scene out of the physicist?

As a new movie opening this weekend, the buzz in my circles has been, well, nil. When I remind people that it’s a prequel to The Da Vinci Code, two questions usually follow: did they fix Tom Hanks hair, and does that mean it happened first? Yes they did, and no it didn’t. Sure, Wolverine and Star Trek got out of the gate first, but this is Ron Howard directing Tom Hanks. Are they simply advertising to a different audience, or does the studio feel this combination is already unbeatable? Having watched the film, it could have benefited from a little more advertising as to what the central theme is really about.

Once again, Langdon is pitted against a secret society, this time the oft-used Illuminati (hey, the best trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist, right?) What follows is an abridged versions of what the Large Hadron Collider at CERN is supposed to do (which, as of this review, still hasn’t been able to do) and a centuries-old revenge scheme about the Vatican covering up the original works of Galileo because of how they opposed church doctrine. Of course, the underlying story here isn’t as black or white as The Da Vinci Code or even as polarizing as pro-choice vs pro-life. It deals with fundamental doctrine: the betterment of mankind through prospected science or introspected faith.

There’s a lot more science in Dan Brown’s fiction this time around, and that’s where the film decidedly nukes the fridge. With everything at stake (including what’s really going on behind the scenes), the possibilities for anything like this coming together at all (let alone in a timely manner) are slim at best. And come on, how can you NOT hope for the chance to see an anti-matter explosion? What remains is a far-fetched but watchable thriller mixed with a enough history to make it interesting but not compelling (you know, like National Treasure, but without Nicolas Cage). But if Dan Brown, Ron Howard, and Tom Hanks get in line for thirds, enough with the European churches hiding secret societies, okay?

(a two and a half skull recommendation out of four)
2.5 out of four skulls

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon

» Dig around in these buried remains...

  • ‘Angels & Demons’ to Follow ‘Da Vinci’ 5/22/2006
  • Review: ‘The DaVinci Code’ 5/20/2006
  • Grim Thoughts for 2007-10-26 10/26/2007
  • ‘Da Vinci Code’ Underwhelms at Cannes? 5/17/2006
  • DaVinci Code to Remain Controversial 12/21/2005
  • Review: National Treasure 12/8/2004
  • And Now, “The Norman Rockwell Code” 5/11/2006

May 16th, 2009 in crypt, movie, reviews |

2 Responses to “ Review: ‘Angels & Demons’ ”

  1. # 1 Auntie Maim Says:
    May 17th, 2009 at 12:00 am

    An anti-matter bomb. Hmmm… Does that mean it doesn’t matter?

    I don’t care for Dan Brown’s books, so I’ve avoided the films, but I finally did see National Treasure. It was almost a knockoff of Indiana Jones, but entertaining in spite of that.

    And for the record, most people are tired of the Illuminati. I read a publisher’s submission guidelines last month, and they actually said, “No more stories with the Illuminati.” So maybe the Ron Howard/Tom Hanks combo would have better success these days if they dropped Dan Brown and found new material.

  2. # 2 kindragon Says:
    May 20th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    My real beef with this is that Langdon had about 4 hours to solve the damn thing. Shit you can’t drive around Rome more than maybe once in 4 hours little lone find clues and fight bad guys. Also I was hoping they would actually blow up Vatican city. Guess I should have read the book.

  • Recent Movie Reviews

    • Review: ‘The Dead Matter’
    • Review: ‘Grown Ups’
    • Review: ‘Knight and Day’
    • Review: ‘Salt’
    • Review: ‘Inception’
    • Review: ‘The Twilight Saga: Eclipse’
    • Review: ‘Toy Story 3′
    • Review: ‘Jonah Hex’
    • Review: ‘The Karate Kid’ (2010)
  • Latest Previews

    • Trailer: ‘Vampires Suck’
    • ‘Mortal Kombat: Rebirth’ Footage?
    • ‘Dead Matter’ DVD at Hot Topic on July 30th
  • Reaper Rantings

    • Four-Skull Ratings Explained
    • Things Learned from San Diego Comic Con #sdcc
    • Virtual San Diego Comic Con 2010 #sdcc
  • Recommendations

    • Auntie Maim
    • Calls for Cthulhu
    • Rocket Red Glare
    • Savage Mojo
    • The Amplified Dojo
    • Thinking Skull
  • We’re Attending…

    MegaCon
    Oasis
    Rapier
    Florida Super Con
    Ancient City Con
    Spooky Empire
  • We’re Watching…

    Big Bang Theory
    Burn Notice
    Castle
    Chuck
    Fringe
    House, M.D.
    Human Target
    In Plain Sight
    Lie to Me
    Sanctuary
    Stargate Universe
    Supernatural
    True Blood
    Warehouse 13
  • Grim Thinking (Twitter)…

  • Follow Grim: MySpace, Facebook, & Twitter.

Film critique with a focus on storytelling, supernatural elements, and the potential to become a cinema classic.
Crypt · Search  ||  Reviews · Previews · Rantings  ||  Store · Contact
about · lexicon · terms · ratings · extras · mobile · links · feeds · video 

Bingo - Credit Consolidation - click fraud protection - United Specialties


All original content for MovieCrypt.com © 1998-Present. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress. Entries and Comments. Valid XHTML. XML Sitemap.

Theme "MovieCrypt X" adapted by ThinkingSkull from Anubis 1.0 (made by Nurudin Jauhari)
Grim's Ghostwriter: Kevin A. Ranson (He's making me do this.)

Movies and DVD. Previews for the Post Mortem, Reviews for the Recently Deceased.
Reaping & Critiquing Thrillers, Chillers, & Killers.
Film critique isn’t dead until I SAY it is.