Review: Exorcist: The Beginning

Interesting but not compelling, spooky but not scary. Merging a story of regaining faith with every supernatural element of the original Exorcist succeeds only in surpassing the first unnecessary sequel.

Only a few years following the end of World War II, a discovery is made in East Africa: the remnants of a Catholic church that dates to a time and place that there should not be one. A young Lancaster Merrin (Stellan Skarsg??rd) is asked to investigate the claim because of his knowledge of religious artifacts, but what he finds there will challenge his lost faith in order to do battle with a demon that can posses the innocent.

This is actually the second cut of two films created by Warner Bros. following the successful re-release of the original film The Exorcist. A hastily-made sequel (The Heretic) fell flat following that movie, but a third film subtitled Legion managed to re-capture a little of the old black magic from William Friedkin?€™s direction of the original film. That said, The Beginning is better than The Heretic but on the same old tired scares that modern audiences shun.

The core story is actually interesting, that of a priest regaining his faith in a time of adversity. Parallels are drawn throughout the film about racial misunderstandings leading to genocide, but at the same time the film undermines a good story with false scares, unrealistically loud noises, and repeated shots of desert scavengers feasting on a free-meal corpse (the work of the devil if ever there was one). To put it another way, the cheap thrills feel sprinkled around instead of allowing the audience to be drawn into the story because their too busy rolling their eyes at constant reminders that, ?€?THIS is an EXORCIST movie!?€?

Stellan Skarsg??rd does the tortured character well and is perfect for the younger Merrin and a worthy successor to Max von Sydow as the senior Merrin; I originally envisioned Skarsg??rd as ?€?Doc Ock?€? for Spider-Man 2 before Alfred Molina sold me instead. Izabella Scorupco has been working on her American accent and is finally given a chance to play a less tough, more feminine roll than the ones she usually gets (GoldenEye, Reign of Fire). James D’Arcy, however, was annoying every second he was one screen; it seems that at every moment he?€™s about to smile at some unfortunate thing that?€™s happily happening to someone else.

The Exorcist featured a priest harboring a secret past with a demon while the Legion showed what happened to the demon afterward, so shouldn?€™t the Beginning have been expected to delve into the demon?€™s origins? What is the demon?€™s purpose? Where did the missing victims disappear to? Was it absolutely necessary to show a child tied to bed while breakable things fall of a nearby shelf? Instead of answers and horror you get promises and parlor tricks, and no amount of computer-generated flies or hyenas make the final cut any more forgivable.

(a two skull recommendation out of four)

Advertisements

About Grim D. Reaper, your death angel critic

Your death angel critic for film at MovieCrypt.com.
This entry was posted in Crypt. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Review: Exorcist: The Beginning

  1. rose says:

    this is a sequal that follows on from every other movie.No movie is different anymore..they all have the same story-line and they arent based on their own unique style.Same goes for evey other horror/thriller movie,this movie for me gets a no skull outta 5…more like a minus 10 to be exact!

  2. Richard Reeves says:

    I liked the movie until the pathetic exorcism scene.It was laughable,cheap looking and not at all acurate to the original story.It was suposed to be a possessed 8 year old African boy,not some one they wrote in the script to look like Linda Blair from the comedy repossessed.It had some interesting and scary stuff,but it would have been more effective if it was closer to what actually took place before the exorcist.It doesn’t really explain how the demon got to the USA in the first place.It never even mentioned it’s name.Who the hell came up with the name Pazzuzo?The cheap fony looking contacts the actress wore and the cheesy dialogue just ruined the whole experience for me and I am still angry 48 hours later after seeing the Goddamned film.I am looking forward to viewing the dvd when it comes out hoping there are different endings.I also am curious about all the footage that was deleted.I keep hearing there is another whole different version of this film that is gonna be released on dvd.i can’t wait to view this one.I have a feeling it’s the version that should have been released to theatres.

  3. Maribel says:

    I saw this today. it was good, better than the original and the other two.

  4. i want the exorcist the beginning

Have Your Cinematic Say, Mortal.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s