Review: 'Silent Hill'

Lessons learned: Never underestimate the creativity of a wronged West Virginian with access to barbed wire.

Rose (Radha Mitchell) has an adopted daughter, Sharon (Jodelle Ferland), with a sleepwalking problem. When awakened abruptly, Sharon mutters something about Silent Hill, a town in West Virginia not far from where Sharon was adopted. Against the better judgement of her husband (Sean Bean), Rose becomes obsessed with the idea that the town holds some secret to her daughter’s nightmares. Leaving her husband behind, Rose takes Sharon into West Virginia and finds the infamous Silent Hill, only to realize too late that she has made a terrible mistake: she was exactly right.

Silent Hill is based on the video game of the same title, but I’ve neither played the game nor seen it played, so my initial impressions of film were through the advertising and trailers just like many other folks. What drew my attention was the production design, the hints of horror strewn throughout, and Radha Mitchell’s genuine terror at what wasn’t a computer-generated effect. Better yet, there were hints of things too intense to show in any approved preview online, that and the creepy music that sounded like a twisted children’s story.

To those uninitiated in the multiverse of faith in horror films, here’s a primer; imagine that Heaven, Earth, and Hell all exist at the same time in the same place, just in a different dimension (like in Constantine or The Others). Something presumably supernatural has divided Silent Hill into two distinct parallel places: the real, abandoned town of Silent Hill and a Limbo-like fold where the living and dead exist too close together (for old tabletop gamers, can you say “Ravenloft”?) Periodically when an air raid siren alarms, a literal Darkness comes and turns Limbo over into Hell itself for a limited duration before it again receeds. For this reason, the characters in the film are very confused and so might the audience be; hopefully, this will clear up a little of the confusion. The real questions are, what caused it, what is maintaining the dimensional separation, why does the Darkness both come and go, and what does all of it have to do with Sharon? Heck, how did Rose and her daughter cross over to begin with?

The good news? It all works. From the quick start getting our characters introduced and into the proverbial frying pan to the layered ‘worlds’ that separate the characters even in the same location, Silent Hill follows an eerie kind of logic that refuses to break the rules once they are set, including the subtle yet just ending. Computer imagery is used only when it must be; grotesque makeup designs and contortionist actors created the creepy monsters to be live and in person. And the R rating? Director Christophe Gans revels in it like an evil little girl dancing gleefully in a shower of blood; whatever you think he won’t show, just wait and he will.

The bad news? The story seems a bit padded, with Sean Bean’s character essentially a plot device about the wages of sin and a certain set piece where the film grinds to a halt not once but twice. Still, the trade off of a little exposition and an almost too-convenient explanation for everything is a small price to pay for a horror-thriller that refuses to rely on loud noises and false scares. In fact, the one thing you can count on in Silent Hill is that if it looks nasty and able to come for you, you in fact should not wait around to give whatever it is the opportunity.

Watch and listen, because clues are everywhere. While the mystery of Silent Hill is the glue that ties the horror together, a love for the kinds of twisted evil plots about outcasts and sin is the guise it wears. Finally, if Silent Hill looks like the kind of film you’d probably enjoy, you most likely will and won’t much want to leave. And why should you? No one else ever does…

(a four skull recommendation out of four)

Advertisements

About Grim D. Reaper, your death angel critic

Your death angel critic for film at MovieCrypt.com.
This entry was posted in Crypt. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Review: 'Silent Hill'

  1. Think I’m nuts for a four-skull recommendation? I STILL can’t quit smiling about it!

  2. Usaki Li says:

    I’m a huge Silent Hill fan played and own all four games and a huge horror/survial horror (movie/game) fan. Even if the movie doesn’t scare you, even if the story doesn’t make sense to you, you’ll still be glad you saw it for the gore. I too would give it a four out of four, it’s everything I was hoping for, it had every element that made the Silent Hill games great (minus the Sean Bean parts.) I still can’t stop laughing and smiling about all the people that were horribly killed. Not to mention that I didn’t see any parts where you just think to you’re self: man that’s totally C.G.. And that’s hard to do with subject matter like that.

  3. Andrew Cook says:

    Well, the critics hate it, but professional critics never do understand horror films.

  4. Tom says:

    I’m not into scary movies. But I DO want to see SH precisely because “Silent Hill 2” for the PS2 was such an absolutely great, beautiful, disturbing game. (Poor, poor Angela.) And knowing full well that 90% of the “professional” film reviewers out there were going to dump on the movie for ANY reason, I figured I’d seek out a few independent voices, ones that aren’t as On The Payroll as others (hello, Roger Ebert). Based on what I’ve read here and elsewhere, I’m convinced that it’s as faithful as Hollywood’s prepared to allow (for now), and I’m going.

  5. Parker says:

    I’ll definitely agree with the 4 skull review and what Tom said about professional critics. Silent Hill doesn’t rely on the games as a crutch to help it stand and even as far as horror movies go, SH pretty much is of its own ilk.

  6. If you have seen ‘Silent Hill’ and want to discuss the ending further, we have opened a discussion on The Minion Boards: Deeper Cryptique right here: https://moviecrypt.com/minionboards/viewtopic.php?t=81

  7. Looks like ‘Silent Hill’ won the weekend, too, over ‘The Sentinel.’ ‘American Dreamz’ tanked.

  8. Amy says:

    Silent Hill is awsome. It won my weekend over. I think i watched it like 15 times on a saturday and like 5 times the next day. It was okey but it should not be veiwed by little ones because of bad dreams. Nor kids who are afraid of the dark. So yah. It was an awsome movie to me.

  9. Nice! Now we want a 2-disc goodies edition…!

  10. Maric says:

    Thank you, freaking thank you. I can’t believe the movie only has a 28% rating on Rotten Tomatos, it’s like everyone’s lost and confused. I don’t think many of those critics tried to set their heart into the film and honestly try to understand but thank you for giving a honest review about the film that lights it along the way. I admit I myself feared it would go down in flames, but watching it was beautiful.

    Seriously, maybe some of them will look at it again later and try to see that all the monsters actually have meaning; they’re not just there to give you a cheap thrill, they’re there to mean something in the essence that is twisted humanity and demonion.

    Just again, your review totally made me happy.

Have Your Cinematic Say, Mortal.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s