Review: ‘Where the Wild Things Are’

Never having read the childrens book, it must be better than this.

Max (Max Records) has an overactive imagination and some problems at home with his mom (Catherine Keener) finding little time for him. Dressed in pajamas that make him look like a forest animal, an incident trying to get his mom to pay attention to him goes badly, prompting the boy to run away to a far off land full of giant critter things. The over-sized creature appear to play games all day where they make up the rules as they go, then stand around to moan and whine about everything the rest of time. Seriously?!

Is this supposed to be a metaphor for childhood? Okay, there are these cool-looking monster critters that look like the drawings from the book, and there’s the boy who convinces them he is their king and should do what he says. Other than the obvious, the rest of time seems spent on petty flip-flop arguments that sound like nursery infighting or politicians being pressed to give an actual answer to an honest question.

The voice cast for the creatures is considerable, including James Gandolfini, Catherine O’Hara, Forest Whitaker, Michael Berry Jr., and Chris Cooper. The world they seem to inhabit is like the playground from a child’s mind. But everything else seems to fall short, as if audiences are already supposed to get who these characters are and what they’re doing. Someone worked very hard to make this, but the end result is like the most boring episode ever of Sid and Marty Krofft’s “H.R. Pufnstuf.”

Was this for kids? For adults? Does it make sense after a drinking a considerable amount of alcohol or overdosing on prescription drugs? After watching shows like “Captain Kangaroo,” “Sesame Street,” and anything by Sid and Marty Krofft, Where the Wild Things Are feels like punishment for having ever watched these shows and enjoyed them. Again, the book has to be better than this. Actually, it might be therapeutic to round up the cast of “Peewee’s Playhouse” and go beat the pulp out those so-called “wild things.”

(a zero skull recommendation out of four)


  1. Agreed. It’s for a terrible movie.

    Make no mistake; I don’t enjoy writing reviews like this, especially when so many people had input on what this movie could have been. What I saw, however, was horrid. I can’t imagine a kid sitting still for it or a parent who wouldn’t fall asleep watching it with them.


  2. Of course its a metaphor for childhood. Or growing up. I haven’t read the book either, but I can understand that the movie is about the interactions and how he governs his own feelings and emotions.

    The audience -is- supposed to get it. And the “petty arguments” are between characters that are implied to be parts of the kid, Max (if not childhood at large). If you give it a modicum of thought, its a thought provoking and heartfelt movie. Top that with a film cinematography thats easy on the eyes, and you’ve got at least an above average movie.

    How “MacGruber” strikes you as more worthwhile than this film is beyond me. I’m not sure that this an bad review; its more of a really lazy and thoughtless one.


Speak up, Mortal -- and beware of Spoilers!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s