Championing psychological horror over bloodletting gore lowers the rating but ups the ante.
Battling childhood trauma, Mike (Josh Hutchinson) can’t manage to hold down a job, threatening the welfare of his younger sister Abby (Piper Rubio) for whom he is solely responsible. Their Aunt Jane (Mary Stuart Masterson) wants custody of Abby — and any state funds that come with it — including plans to get Mike fired to make him appear even more dysfunctional. Down on his luck, Mike takes a desperate night security position at the defunct Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza, a relic of the 1980s stocked with aged video game consoles and an anthropomorphic band of mechanical characters. When local beat cop Vanessa (Elizabeth Lail) takes an unnatural interest in Mike’s wellbeing and success in his new job, the mysteries of Fazbear’s begin to unravel in ways he could never have imagined… and they’re about to get worse.
The popular 2014 video game phenomenon finally gets the big screen treatment. Game writer and creator Scott Cawthorn co-wrote the screenplay with Seth Cuddleback for a film directed by Emma Tammi. Older generations of horror fans equate the name “Freddy” with A Nightmare on Elm Street, and it’s more than interesting all the dream-stalker elements to Five Nights as well. In spite of having Universal and Blumhouse money, the production touts creature effects from the Jim Henson company, bringing a practical effects approach to the inhabitants of Freddy’s — yep, they’re now technically Muppets (you were thinking it). It’s no secret there’s a built-in audience perfect for a late Halloween weekend feature targeting the generation most likely to plunk down a dime to see it, but is it enough to jumpstart a sleepy and hollow box office sans Taylor Swift?
The worst thing about Freddy’s cinematic debut may be the money left on the table with a simultaneous release streaming on Peacock, but that doesn’t always translate into a bad box office. In other words, it’s pretty good! Fans have said it’s a decent translation to the screen, almost ninety percent of what fans expect with a couple of twists. For those who don’t know what’s coming waiting for the carnage to start, the first act seems rather slow with the introductions, but the final act hinges on those setups to work. Similar to the Ringu remake The Ring, a lot more is implied than shown, and while less effective than Samara crawling out of a broken television, Freddy’s holds its own and delivers a quick spooky season fix to fans old (the kids) and new (the adults).
Mathew Lillard lends his horror pedigree to the production, but the only standout performance other than a carnivorous cupcake is Piper Rubio as Abby, who doesn’t come into her own until the other bloody shoe drops. It would be remiss not to mention the 2020 Nic Cage vehicle Willy’s Wonderland when talking about animatronic pizzeria horror fare — is this really a genre now? In the same way that certain tropes in Freddy’s certainly feels borrowed from earlier horror fare, Willy’s is the racy R-rated country cousin who takes the gloves off for a no-holds-barred “Cage” match, going all the places Freddy’s can only hint about. While Willy’s beat Freddy’s to the theatrical punch, the inspirations are all there, making for an interesting back-to-back double feature opportunity following Freddy’s up with Willy’s for pure catharsis.
Since Freddy’s made its video game debut, there have been sequels, novels, and tie-ins galore, so a win here will guarantee further Fazbear adventures in the future. We’re unlikely to get a Willy’s sequel, so maybe Freddy’s can fill that gaping hole in our black hearts later on. Speaking of haunted and/or cursed animatronics, can we all agree the 2022 Spirit Halloween movie was really bad?
Five Nights at Freddy’s is rated PG-13 for strong violent content, bloody images, language, and an appropriate lack of a Nic Cage’s Willy.
Three skull recommendation out of four

Why all the hate here?
Several critics have cited Five Nights at Freddy’s as one of the worst films of the year (some even while championing its record-breaking domestic and international box office take). Why is it getting such hate?
Let’s venture into spoiler territory and peek under the headstone.
The film opens slowly, setting up our protagonist Mike and his backstory. Anyone under stress and perhaps a bit haunted knows what a sleep disorder looks like, and while it may not make for a compelling hero seeing someone barely holding on and nearly falling apart, it is what it is.
Mike blames himself for not stopping the kidnapping of his little brother Garret, hinting he also blames himself for the collapse of his family. He’s convinced himself his redemption lies in unlocking some hidden detail of that fateful to provide him closure. Forced to step up as a guardian to his little sister Abby, he also battles their loveless greedy Aunt Jane in a constant custody battle. Mike is not in a position to make any competent decisions, and anyone growing up in a broken household are going to be able to relate.
While admitting Abby deserves better — even if that’s their despicable aunt — Mike is still trying his best, including taking a dead-end night security job to continue conducting his personal sleep study while at work. None of these are good decisions, but Mike still tries, a fact encouraged by a councilor who reminds him Abby is dealing with her own situation her own way, including making her guardian brother a central figure in her drawings.
Armed with a dream study paperback and audio/visual stimulus, Mike has taught himself how to shape his dreams to relive this terrifying moment over and over… but at Freddy’s, his dream becomes more lucid and vivid. He hopes the new children abruptly appearing in his dream could become guides to help find what he’s been searching for. Freddy’s now has value to Mike in spite of any dangers — real hope and possible peace of mind — which unfortunately leads to more unpopular choices.
Of course, Mike is blinded to everything else or more than willing to dismiss it: a too-curious local beat cop, an inexplicably free sitter, or how many of these elements are borrowed from A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors. But some them are not so hard to fathom: broken-home-trauma Abby bonding with possessed animatronic critters (themselves created through trauma) and a daughter attempting to make amends for her father’s known villainy.
While the story eventually provides some closure and comeuppance in the film’s finale, there are problems, most of which seem to stem from a lack of explanation: why there’s a seemingly possessed face-mutilating Saw-like trap chair, whether Vanessa is even a real cop or not (and why is Mike ready to forgive someone who’s been willingly involved in the deaths of others since the beginning), what influence the Yellow Rabbit suit/man has over the kids, and how Freddy’s kids have the power to influence dreams.
The movie sin of being too mysterious can be dealbreakers for horror fans who demand explanations but less so for those willing to imagine possibilities, are just along for the ride, or who already know what’s coming up with any potential sequels. Based on their record-breaking box office take, Mike and Abby’s story is far from done, and Blumhouse has another franchise in the making.
💀
LikeLike